<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Gets It Wrong: Phishing Does Hurt Us All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/phishing/phishing-risk-online-banking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/phishing/phishing-risk-online-banking</link>
	<description>News and Information about Cyber Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:56:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel James</title>
		<link>http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/phishing/phishing-risk-online-banking/comment-page-1#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyveillanceblog.com/?p=245#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Great article! You are absolutely right. Simply saying that no one needs to be careful with their information because the &quot;banks&quot; will have to worry about it is ignoring the larger problem. The losses the bank or merchant incurs will eventually translate into higher cost for everyone. This is akin to saying that there is no point in revealing a shoplifter to a security guard because it isn&#039;t your store- when in fact, we know that those loses are rolled into the prices we pay for products every day. Cybersecurity is EVERYONE&#039;S PROBLEM, and an empty bank account is definitely not the least of a person&#039;s troubles if they fall for phishing schemes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! You are absolutely right. Simply saying that no one needs to be careful with their information because the &#8220;banks&#8221; will have to worry about it is ignoring the larger problem. The losses the bank or merchant incurs will eventually translate into higher cost for everyone. This is akin to saying that there is no point in revealing a shoplifter to a security guard because it isn&#8217;t your store- when in fact, we know that those loses are rolled into the prices we pay for products every day. Cybersecurity is EVERYONE&#8217;S PROBLEM, and an empty bank account is definitely not the least of a person&#8217;s troubles if they fall for phishing schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
